Sierre coach crash — A School Coach Strikes a Tunnel Wall, Cause Undetermined
On the night of 13 March 2012, at about 9:15 p.m., a Belgian-registered double-decker coach carrying a school group home from a ski holiday deviated from its lane inside the A9 motorway tunnel near Sierre, in the Swiss canton of Valais, and struck the wall at the end of an emergency lay-by head-on. Twenty-eight people were killed — twenty-two of them children, returning from a week in the Val d’Anniviers — together with four accompanying adults and both drivers. Twenty-four other children were injured. It was one of the worst road accidents in modern Swiss history and a national tragedy in Belgium.
The coach was carrying pupils and staff from two Belgian primary schools, ‘t Stekske in Lommel and Sint-Lambertus in Heverlee, along with children from other groups. It was travelling normally on the motorway when, inside the tunnel, it drifted from its line, mounted the kerb of an emergency stopping bay, and hit the concrete wall at the bay’s far end. The impact was head-on and at motorway speed; the deaths were caused by the collision itself. Among the dead were the two coach drivers.
The investigation must be named precisely. It was conducted by the Valais cantonal public prosecutor (Ministère public valaisan), under prosecutor Olivier Elsig — a judicial criminal inquiry into possible negligent homicide, not a probable-cause report by a transport-safety board. Switzerland’s accident-investigation board (the body now known as the STSB/SUST) does not, by its mandate, investigate road accidents, and it did not investigate this one. The distinction matters: what follows is the conclusion of a closed cantonal-prosecutor judicial inquiry, not a safety-board “probable cause.”
That inquiry closed on 30 June 2014 with the cause officially undetermined. Prosecutor Elsig stated that, after a dense and complex investigation, the exact cause of the tragedy could not be established, but that every surviving hypothesis related to the deceased driver — and that all other possibilities had been dismissed. Third-party involvement, the tunnel infrastructure, excessive speed, alcohol, and technical or vehicle fault were ruled out. The investigation thus excluded the road, the vehicle, and any outside party, while declining to specify which driver-related explanation was correct. Bereaved families, dissatisfied with an undetermined finding, later commissioned an independent reconstruction in an effort to revisit the case.